California Court of Appeal Rules Arbitration Agreement Is Unenforceable
Quick Hits
- A California appellate court refused to enforce an arbitration agreement due to both substantive and procedural unconscionability.
- The court ruled certain provisions within the agreement rendered it substantively unconscionable and the manner in which it was presented electronically was procedurally unconscionable. In combination, the court found the “high degree” of unconcionability rendered the agreement unenforceable.
On December 21, 2023, the California Court of Appeal Third Appellate District in Hasty v. American Automobile Association of Northern California, Nevada & Utah rejected the employer’s bid to compel arbitration over claims of race and disability discrimination, harassment, wrongful discharge, and retaliation in violation of California law.
The court found the arbitration agreement at issue was unenforceable because it was both substantively and procedurally unconscionable. Importantly, the court scrutinized not just the language in the agreement but how the employer obtained electronic acknowledgments of the agreement.
Substantive Unconscionability
The Court of Appeal found the agreement was substantively unconscionable in four different ways. First, according to the court, the agreement contained an overly broad confidentiality clause.
Second, the court interpreted the agreement as waiving both individual and nonindividual claims under California’s Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA).
Third, the court found the agreement was overly broad in that it required the parties to waive their right to “any remedy or relief” resulting from a charge or complaint before a governmental agency.
Finally, the agreement provided a link to the applicable arbitration rules on a third party website, and the link no longer worked.
Procedural Unconscionability
In finding the arbitration agreement was procedurally unconscionable, the Court of Appeal relied almost exclusively on the employer’s method of electronic distribution of the arbitration agreement to employees and process for obtaining electronic acknowledgments of the agreement.
According to the decision, the plaintiff reviewed the onboarding documents on a smartphone with a smaller screen relative to a desktop computer or paper copy and as a result may have had difficulty reading what was presented.
Additionally, an employee had to click on an icon to view the arbitration agreement and could record their electronic acknowledgment by clicking on “I Agree” without ever accessing the agreement itself. The court’s decision highlights that the procedure by which employers present arbitration agreements to their employees is a key factor for courts when reviewing the enforceability of such agreements.
Conclusion and Next Steps
According to the court, the arbitration was “permeated with unconscionability” and therefore the offending provisions could not be severed pursuant to the agreement’s severance provision. The combination of significant procedural unconscionability, combined with substantive unconscionability, led the court to deny enforcement of the agreement.
In light of the court’s decision, employers may want to review their use of arbitration agreements for updates based on the evolving nuances in this area of the law. They may further want to review their processes for electronic distribution of arbitration agreements and processes for gathering electronic acknowledgments.
Ogletree Deakins’ Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution, Class Action, and California Class Action and PAGA practice groups will continue to monitor developments and will provide updates on the Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution, Class Action, and California blogs.
Follow and Subscribe
Reach Out
Don’t hesitate to reach out to us to discuss your specific needs. Our team is ready and eager to provide you with tailored solutions that align with your firm’s goals and enhance your digital marketing efforts. We look forward to helping you grow your law practice online.
Our Services:
Blog Post Writing
We do well-researched, timely, and engaging blog posts that resonate with your clientele, positioning you as a thought leader in your domain.
Content Writing: Beyond blogs, we delve into comprehensive content pieces like eBooks, whitepapers, and case studies, tailored to showcase your expertise.
Website Content Writing
First impressions matter. Our content ensures your website reflects the professionalism, dedication, and expertise you bring to the table.
Social Media Management
In today’s interconnected world, your online presence extends to social platforms. We help you navigate this terrain, ensuring your voice is consistently represented and heard.
WordPress Website Maintenance
Your digital office should be as polished and functional as your physical one. We ensure your WordPress site remains updated, secure, and user-friendly.
For more information, ad placements in our attorney blog network, article requests, social media management, or listings on our top 10 attorney sites, reach out to us at seoattorneyservices@gmail.com.
Warm regards,